Literature Cited and Other Resources
Literature Cited
Bainbridge, V., S. Foerster, K. Pasteur, M. Pimbert, G. Pratt, and I. Y. Arroyo. 2000. Transforming Bureaucracies: Institutionalising participatory approaches and processes for natural resource management: an annotated bibliography. International Institute for Environment and Development, Institute of Development Studies, London, UK.
Charles, C., K. Keenleyside, R. Chapple, B. Kilburn, P. Salah van der Leest, D. Allen, M. Richardson, M. Giusti, L. Franklin, M. Harbrow, R. Wilson, A. Moss, L. Metcalf, L. Camargo, 2018. Home to Us All: How Connecting with Nature Helps Us Care for Ourselves and the Earth, 2018. The Children & Nature Network.
Cottrell and Associates Environmental Consulting, 2010. The North American Conservation Education Strategy: Benefits of Outdoor Skills to Health, Learning and Lifestyle: A Literature Review. Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies.
Decker, D., C. Smith, A. Forstchen, D. Hare, E. Pomeranz, C. Doyle-Capitman, K. Schuler, and J. Organ. 2016. Governance Principles for Wildlife Conservation in the 21st Century. Conservation Biology 9(4), 290–295.
Gorman, E. 2005. Gender Stereotypes, Same-Gender Preferences, and Organizational Variation in the Hiring of Women: Evidence from Law Firms. American Sociological Review 70(4).
Heifetz, A. and M. Linsky. 2002. Leadership on the Line: Staying Alive Through the Dangers of Leading. Harvard Business School. Boston, MA. 252 pp.
Jacobson, C.A., and D.J. Decker. 2006. Ensuring the Future of State Wildlife Management: Understanding Challenges for Institutional Change. Wildlife Society Bulletin 34(2):531-536.
Jacobson, C.A. and D.J. Decker. 2008. Future Governance of State Wildlife Management: Reform and Revive or Resist and Retrench? Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal 21:441-448.
Jacobson, C.A., J.F. Organ, D.J. Decker, G.R. Batcheller, and L. Carpenter. 2010. A Conservation Institution for the 21st Century: Implications for State Wildlife Agencies. Journal of Wildlife Management 74(2):203-209. https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2193/2008-485
Jacobson, C.A. and D.J. Decker. 2017. Conservation Relevancy: What Does it Mean to Us and For Us? 82nd North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 82: 27-33.
Jones, M.S and J. Solomon. 2019. Challenges and Supports for Women Conservation Leaders. Conservation Science and Practice. 1(6):1-11. https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/csp2.36
Kellert, S.R. 2012. Birthright: People and Nature in the Modern World. Yale University Press. New Haven, CT. 264 pp.
Kellert, S.R., D.J. Case, D. Escher, D. Witter, J. Mikels-Carasco, P. Seng. 2017. The Nature of Americans. Disconnection and Recommendations for Reconnection, National Report. 364 pp. natureofamericans.org
Kotter, J. 1012. Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press. Boston, MA. 210 pp.
Kuo (Ming), F.E. 2010. Parks and Other Green Environments: Essential Components of a Healthy Human Habitat. National Recreation and Park Association: Research Series.
Manfredo et al. 2018. America’s Wildlife Values — The Social Context of Wildlife Management in the U.S. https://sites.warnercnr.colostate.edu/wildlifevalues/wp-content/uploads/sites/124/2019/01/AWV-National-Final-Report.pdf
Mickel, A. E., and L. Goldberg, 2018. Generating, Scaling Up, and Sustaining Partnership Impact: One Tam’s First Four Years. One Tam. Mickel, A. E., and L. Goldberg, 2019. Partnership Impact Evaluation Guide. One Tam.
Milling, C.R., S. D. Gehrt, and D. W. Howerter. 2019. From Crisis to Collaboration: The North American Waterfowl Management Plan continues to evolve. The Wildlife Professional. May/June: 39-43.
Rice, L. and J. Barth. 2016. Hiring Decisions: The Effect of Evaluator Gender and Gender Stereotype Characteristics on the Evaluation of Job Applicants. Gender Issues 33: 1-21.
Rice, L. and E. Greenlee. 2018. The Effect of Evaluator Masculinity on Dyadic Hiring Decisions. Gender Issues: 36: 136-151.
Riley, S.J., D.J. Decker, L.H. Carpenter, J.F. Organ, W.F. Siemer, G.F. Mattfeld and G.R. Parsons. 2002. The Essence of Wildlife Management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30(2): 585- 93.
Smith, C. 2011. The Role of State Wildlife Professionals Under the Public Trust Doctrine. The Journal of Wildlife Management 75(7):1539–1543.
Sterne,R., D.Heaney, B. Britton. The Partnership Toolbox. World Wide Fund for Nature.
The Avarna Group. Conservation Lands Foundation Hiring Toolkit. Conservation Lands Foundation.
The Outdoor Foundation, 2018. Outdoor Participation Report. The Outdoor Foundation.
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, 2016. 2016 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation.
The Blue Ribbon Panel on Sustaining America’s Diverse Fish and Wildlife
Visit https://www.fishwildlife.org/afwa-informs/resources/blue-ribbon-panel to read about the panel members and view the long or short version of the panel’s 2016 report: “The Future of America’s Fish and Wildlife: A 21st Century Vision for Investing in and Connecting People to Nature”
Decker et. al 2016 Governance Principles for Wildlife Conservation in the 21st Century
1. Wildlife governance will be adaptable and responsive to citizens’ current needs and interests, while also being forward-looking to conserve options of future generations.
2. Wildlife governance will seek and incorporate multiple and diverse perspectives.
3. Wildlife governance will apply social and ecological science, citizens’ knowledge, and trust administrators’ judgment.
4. Wildlife governance will produce multiple, sustainable benefits for all beneficiaries.
5. Wildlife governance will ensure that trust administrators are responsible for maintaining trust resources and allocating benefits from the trust.
6. Wildlife governance will be publicly accessible and transparent.
7. Wildlife governance will ensure that trust administrators are publicly accountable.
8. Wildlife governance will include means for citizens to become informed and engaged in decision-making.
9. Wildlife governance will include opportunities for trust administrators to meet their obligations in partnerships with nongovernmental entities.
10. Wildlife governance will facilitate collaboration and coordination across ecological, jurisdictional and ownership boundaries.
Smith 2011 The Role of State Wildlife Professionals Under the Public Trust Doctrine
The Public Trust Doctrine (PTD) is considered the cornerstone of the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation. Effective application of the PTD requires a clear understanding of the doctrine and appropriate behavior by trustees, trust managers, and beneficiaries. Most PTD literature refers generically to the role of the government as the people’s trustee, without addressing the differences between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government in the United States or recognizing the distinction between elected and appointed officials and career civil servants. Elected and appointed officials, especially in the legislative branch, have policy-level decision-making authority that makes them trustees of the people’s wildlife under the PTD. In contrast, career professionals working for state wildlife agencies (SWAs) have ministerial duties as trust managers. The differences between the roles of trustees and trust managers are important. By focusing on their role as trust managers, while supporting and respecting the role of elected and appointed officials as trustees, SWA professionals can more effectively advance application of the PTD.
